GWTW Forum
October 01, 2014, 05:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Forum Info Login Register Chat  
Welcome to the GWTW Forum.
Guests (non-registered users) can view the forum but are unable to post.  If you don't have anything to say then why would you bother to register?
One of the most popular sections of the GWTW Forum has long been the Swap Meet.  A great place to sell old, seldom flown kites or to get great deals on used (gently flown) kites.  Only registered users can see the Swap Meet section, let alone wheel and deal.  1000's (literally) of kites have changed hands thanks to the Swap Meet.
There are several more benefits to being a registered user, but you'll have to join our little community to find out all the "secrets".
Questions or concerns? Contact Steve ... just drop an email to: forum.gwtwkites@gmail.com

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Looking at design  (Read 316 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
stapp59
Trade Count: (+5)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 406


Location: Northern Indiana

WWW
« on: March 17, 2014, 10:48 AM »

I've expressed in past comments how much I like the Exile and recently how the Monster makes a nice compliment as a similarly sized 7.5' kite but with different characteristics. I've asked myself why that is. The pic below shows the two sail panels roughly lined up and overlayed on each other. To me some things are pretty striking.




- overall sail outlines and proportions are similar with subtle differences.
- leading edge on the Monster is swept more forward
- trailing edge profile gives more mid span chord on the Exile.
- lower spreader is moved up on the Monster.
- standoffs spacing are different but centered at the same location and outer standoffs on both kites are longer than the inner standoff.
- Yo-yo stoppers and upper spreaders are at the same locations on the leading edges.

Lest anyone flame me for suggesting designers are stealing from each other; I'm not, so don't. 

What I am suggesting is that the laws of physics and aerodynamics are fairly constant and we are asking our kites to do similar things so we should expect a fair amount of overlap between designs and that's what we see.

In this case you have different respected designers in different parts of the world with different backgrounds, different design philosophies, looking for different flight characteristics in their designs. They both look like 'modern' sport kites. Are they radically different from each other? Not really. Indeed if you overlay multiple sail profiles, one can start to pick out 'families' of design.




While much is known about today's designs, there is still room for refinement. It is the unique combination of sail profile, framing, standoff geometry, bridle geometry, balance, materials, workmanship, and aesthetics that makes a kite what it is. A well designed kite takes a lot of work and trial and error to produce. I've heard the pilot plays a role as well.

I'm not really going anywhere with this, just observations.  It does give me some ideas and things to try...
Logged

Steve in Indiana
http://picasaweb.google.com/stapp59

Fly so it looks like you meant it
Allen Carter
Board Moderator
Trade Count: (+19)
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1820

Location: Half Moon Bay, CA

« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2014, 11:41 AM »

That's a nice visualization of the subtleties of sail shape between two designs. The LE tells the tale there. While I haven't flown a Monster, I could anticipate some of the differences and similarities looking at the two outlines.

Of course the big stack of layouts shows more what you'd expect comparing kite types. The wingtips really tell a story.The inclusion of the Sano lends a bit of old skool to the mix, while keeping within the realm of relevance.

Comparing sails is always interesting. A few years ago I flew a prototype Skyburner Ocius and was intrigued by how much of my enjoyment carried over from my main kite at the time, a decidedly old school '98 HQ Midi. What was it about these kite that had a common thread? Laying one sail on top of another, along with comparing framed up shapes and measurements was very interesting. So many similarities. Just little refinements from a decade of kite development. A few big mechanical things like dual standoffs and a change in weight distribution, but it really showed evolution of a type of kite, from two very different kitebuilders from opposite sides of the Atlantic.
Logged

Allen, AKA kitehead
inewham
Moderator
Trade Count: (+1)
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 379


Location: Nottingham, UK

WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2014, 12:00 PM »

Another great example is the Nirvana compared with an Opium. The 2 sails are really very similar but the way they fly is quite different so its informative to see how a small shift in standoff position, moving the centre-T 1/2" and a fraction off the lower spreaders made such a difference.

A little design evolution that led to a revolution in kite design.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


items purchased through the links below help support the forum

Cal Custom

Our forum is made possible by the good folks whose ads appear below and by the members of our community (PayPal donation button at bottom)
In case you missed it each ad is linked to the sponsors web site.  So please, take a moment and visit our sponsors sites as this forum wouldn't be possible with out them.
Interested in running an ad for your business or kiting event?  Contact Steve at advertise.gwtwkites@gmail.com for a quote.

kmacFab
kmacFab

Kite Classifieds Ad
Kite Classifieds

A Wind Of Change
A Wind Of Change

Kitebookie
Kitebookie.com

Untitled Document

Untitled Document
Untitled Document

Untitled Document
Untitled Document


Untitled Document
DOLLAR SHAVE CLUB

Support the GWTW Forum

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.2.1 © 2008-2009
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!